by Alexander Budanitsky, Graeme Hirst
Abstract:
The quantification of lexical semantic relatedness has many applications in NLP, and many different measures have been proposed. We evaluate five of these measures, all of which use WordNet as their central resource, by comparing their performance in detecting and correcting real-word spelling errors. An information-content-based measure proposed by Jiang and Conrath is found superior to those proposed by Hirst and St-Onge, Leacock and Chodorow, Lin, and Resnik. In addition, we explain why distributional similarity is not an adequate proxy for lexical semantic relatedness.
Reference:
Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness (Alexander Budanitsky, Graeme Hirst), In Computational Linguistics, volume 32, 2006.
Bibtex Entry:
@article{Budanitsky2006,
abstract = {The quantification of lexical semantic relatedness has many applications in NLP, and many different measures have been proposed. We evaluate five of these measures, all of which use WordNet as their central resource, by comparing their performance in detecting and correcting real-word spelling errors. An information-content-based measure proposed by Jiang and Conrath is found superior to those proposed by Hirst and St-Onge, Leacock and Chodorow, Lin, and Resnik. In addition, we explain why distributional similarity is not an adequate proxy for lexical semantic relatedness.},
author = {Budanitsky, Alexander and Hirst, Graeme},
doi = {10.1162/coli.2006.32.1.13},
issn = {0891-2017},
journal = {Computational Linguistics},
keywords = {SML-LIB-BIBLIO,lang:ENG},
mendeley-tags = {SML-LIB-BIBLIO,lang:ENG},
month = mar,
number = {1},
pages = {13--47},
title = {{Evaluating WordNet-based Measures of Lexical Semantic Relatedness}},
url = {http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/coli.2006.32.1.13},
volume = {32},
year = {2006}
}