by F Gregory Ashby, Nancy A Perrin
Abstract:
A new theory of similarity, rooted in the detection and recognition literatures, is developed. The general recognition theory assumes that the perceptual effect of a stimulus is random but that on any single trial it can be represented as a point in a multidimensional space. Similarity is a function of the overlap of perceptual distributions. It is shown that the general recognition theory contains Euclidean distance models of similarity as a special case but that unlike them, it is not constrained by any distance axioms. Three experiments are reported that test the empirical validity of the theory. In these experiments the general recognition theory accounts for similarity data as well as the cur-rently popular similarity theories do, and it accounts for identification data as well as the long-standing "champion " identification model does. The concept of similarity is of fundamental importance in psychology. Not only is there a vast literature concerned directly with the interpretation of subjective similarity judgments (e.g., as in multidimensional scaling) but the concept also plays a cru-cial but less direct role in the modeling of many psychophysical tasks. This is particularly true in the case of pattern and form recognition. It is frequently assumed that the greater the simi-larity between a pair of stimuli, the more likely one will be con-fused with the other in a recognition task (e.g., Luce, 1963; Shepard, 1964; Tversky & Gati, 1982). Yet despite the poten-tially close relationship between the two, there have been only a few attempts at developing theories that unify the similarity and recognition literatures.
Reference:
Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition. (F Gregory Ashby, Nancy A Perrin), In Psychological review, American Psychological Association, volume 95, 1988.
Bibtex Entry:
@article{ashby1988toward,
abstract = {A new theory of similarity, rooted in the detection and recognition literatures, is developed. The general recognition theory assumes that the perceptual effect of a stimulus is random but that on any single trial it can be represented as a point in a multidimensional space. Similarity is a function of the overlap of perceptual distributions. It is shown that the general recognition theory contains Euclidean distance models of similarity as a special case but that unlike them, it is not constrained by any distance axioms. Three experiments are reported that test the empirical validity of the theory. In these experiments the general recognition theory accounts for similarity data as well as the cur-rently popular similarity theories do, and it accounts for identification data as well as the long-standing \"champion \" identification model does. The concept of similarity is of fundamental importance in psychology. Not only is there a vast literature concerned directly with the interpretation of subjective similarity judgments (e.g., as in multidimensional scaling) but the concept also plays a cru-cial but less direct role in the modeling of many psychophysical tasks. This is particularly true in the case of pattern and form recognition. It is frequently assumed that the greater the simi-larity between a pair of stimuli, the more likely one will be con-fused with the other in a recognition task (e.g., Luce, 1963; Shepard, 1964; Tversky \& Gati, 1982). Yet despite the poten-tially close relationship between the two, there have been only a few attempts at developing theories that unify the similarity and recognition literatures.},
author = {Ashby, F Gregory and Perrin, Nancy A},
doi = {DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.124},
journal = {Psychological review},
keywords = {SML-LIB-BIBLIO,lang:ENG},
mendeley-tags = {SML-LIB-BIBLIO,lang:ENG},
number = {1},
pages = {124--150},
publisher = {American Psychological Association},
title = {{Toward a unified theory of similarity and recognition.}},
volume = {95},
year = {1988}
}